On the Wrong Side of Good

Hello again to everyone on this blog. It's your friendly neighbor hood Josh to give you his opinion on what the American government did with the whole Iraq situation. From watching the posted videos, I can't really make a good opinion off of them. To be completely honest, I didn't really get what they were all talking about. The big polotician talk confusses me sometimes. But, I can give you an personal opinion. Really, I don't think we should have went in and do what we did. I believe that America was right in going in to hunt down the terrorists for what they did and what they would continue to do. But, Going in and overthrowing a leader and trying to completely change the government and everything like that. Problems like that had nothing to do with them. It was none of their business. On top of that, they didn't even ask for their help in the first place. What they could have done, though, is talk about it with their government and offer to provide assistance if they agreed. That would have been the best approach in my opinion. To be honest, this very similar to what the Catholic Church did to the people of Umuofia in our book, Things Fall Apart. The Catholics had no right to do that either. They just bardged in and started building churches and also started establishing a government. On top of all that, they just strolled into the villages and started preaching to everyone and telling them that everything that they were doing was completely wrong and that none of them could ever be "saved" unless they did everything the Catholics to do. In doing this, in both situations, they have all disrupted and caused turmoil for the very sides they thought they were "helping". I, for one, cannot agree with this and dissaproave the actions that have taken place.

Varying Situations of Blame

This is your pal, Joshua Lewis, back on the scene for this topic on approaching where blame is due. This topic is a very good discussion point. Do any of the people stated here actually deserve any kind of blame for their actions? Are they perfectly innocent, or are they nothing more than psychotic mass murderers. Well, these questions are very simple to answer. Yes and no to all of them. These answers can both simultaneously exist with the same question. But, one person cannot say both answers for both groups. This is because these questions are all opinionated. Anyone can say that both are wrong, both are right, or one's wrong and the other is wrong. Now, I'm going to give you my opinion on the matter. And, my answers might surprise you. Or, they might not. It all depends on what you believe. First, I would like to talk about those who were involved in the murders in the Holocaust. These men murdered many innocent people for the sake of murdering. These men were part of the Nazi regime. They completely volunteered for this. They volunteered to commit acts of violence and murder on own free will. These men, in my opinion, are completely guilty for what they have done. They are the ones to blame for the things they have done.

Now, I would like to talk about those whom he had kill for them. In my personal opinion, these men are not guilty. These men are carrying out orders from their king. These were men who were raised to do everything the king had told them to do. Everything the king said was absolute law. If the king told them that they had to kill someone for the good of the kingdom, than you knew it was for the good of the kingdom. Also, in this time period, it was very easy to get killed for disobeying what your king has ordered you to do. So, these men had absolutely no room for blame to be placed on them. Their hands are completely clean.